Keyword summary
90% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Accounts results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 5,088 hits . Analysis detected 31,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,690 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (44,303 of 58,192 keywords). This Trump Accounts is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Trump Accounts
Keyword details
Total words: 41,690
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles41.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst