Keyword summary
88% 4 analyzed articles/videos 504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taxpayer Money results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,346 hits . Analysis detected 10,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,347 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (31,651 of 59,867 keywords). This Taxpayer Money is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Taxpayer Money
Keyword details
Total words: 11,347
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst