Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These MartĂn MacĂas results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 723 hits . Analysis detected 2,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This MartĂn MacĂas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. MartĂn MacĂas
Author details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Tu Quoque: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst