Keyword summary
63% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Snapchat results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 8,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,156 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (30,820 of 51,677 keywords). This Snapchat is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Snapchat
Keyword details
Total words: 10,156
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst