Keyword summary
51% 4 analyzed articles/videos 736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San-Francisco Giants results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 461 hits . Analysis detected 2,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,348 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (39,870 of 59,653 keywords). This San-Francisco Giants is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. San-Francisco Giants
Keyword details
Total words: 5,348
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 26% 8/6/2026, 11:52:57 AM