Author summary
50% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Shea results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 568 hits . Analysis detected 5,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,920 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,593 of 9,207 authors). This John Shea is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. John Shea
Author details
Total words: 9,920
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst