Keyword summary
85% 35 analyzed articles/videos 28,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operation Epic Fury results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 11,888 hits . Analysis detected 116,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 111,334 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (38,474 of 59,547 keywords). This Operation Epic Fury is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Operation Epic Fury
Keyword details
Total words: 111,334
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score35 analyzed articles111.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst