Author summary
95% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Spector results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 2,220 hits . Analysis detected 13,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,848 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,414 of 8,524 authors). This David Spector is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. David Spector
Author details
Total words: 7,848
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.6% 16.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.3% 28.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 28.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst