Keyword summary
78% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Tankers results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,721 hits . Analysis detected 11,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,315 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (36,980 of 56,260 keywords). This Oil Tankers is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Oil Tankers
Keyword details
Total words: 14,315
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst