Keyword summary
71% 17 analyzed articles/videos 20,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neuroscience results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 5,799 hits . Analysis detected 55,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,647 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (51,509 of 59,653 keywords). This Neuroscience is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Neuroscience
Keyword details
Total words: 87,647
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score17 analyzed articles87.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst