Author summary
34% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stav Dimitropoulos results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,359 hits . Analysis detected 10,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,564 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (8,083 of 9,471 authors). This Stav Dimitropoulos is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Stav Dimitropoulos
Author details
Total words: 20,564
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst