Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Clabough results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 457 hits . Analysis detected 1,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,867 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,502 of 9,471 authors). This Erin Clabough is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Erin Clabough
Author details
Total words: 3,867
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst