Author summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Mateer Ph.D. results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 1,742 hits . Analysis detected 8,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,282 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,989 of 9,297 authors). This Elizabeth Mateer Ph.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Elizabeth Mateer Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 9,282
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.8% 18.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.6% 6.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst