Keyword summary
85% 19 analyzed articles/videos 16,562 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nature results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 5,195 hits . Analysis detected 55,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,801 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (50,301 of 58,033 keywords). This Nature is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Nature
Keyword details
Total words: 80,801
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score19 analyzed articles80.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst