Author summary
40% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Osborne results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,491 hits . Analysis detected 8,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,230 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,931 of 9,471 authors). This Hannah Osborne is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Hannah Osborne
Author details
Total words: 21,230
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst