Keyword summary
81% 27 analyzed articles/videos 14,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maryland results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 5,893 hits . Analysis detected 43,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,521 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (51,815 of 59,653 keywords). This Maryland is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Maryland
Keyword details
Total words: 62,521
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score27 analyzed articles62.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst