Keyword summary
95% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Haberman results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 3,292 hits . Analysis detected 17,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,732 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (21,475 of 56,737 keywords). This Maggie Haberman is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Maggie Haberman
Keyword details
Total words: 13,732
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.0% 24.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst