Keyword summary
98%8 analyzed articles/videos5,400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luxury Real Estate results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 3,565 hits. Analysis detected 35,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,480 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 73% (16,101 of 57,844 keywords). This Luxury Real Estate is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Luxury Real Estate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
73%Luxury Real Estate (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.0%11.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate