Author summary
89% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary K. Jacob results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,465 hits . Analysis detected 9,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,654 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,633 of 9,200 authors). This Mary K. Jacob is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Mary K. Jacob
Author details
Total words: 9,654
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 15.2%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst