Keyword summary
94% 15 analyzed articles/videos 8,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel-Hamas War results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 3,877 hits . Analysis detected 30,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,588 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (48,317 of 59,653 keywords). This Israel-Hamas War is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Israel-Hamas War
Keyword details
Total words: 38,588
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles38.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst