Author summary
78%3 analyzed articles/videos1,776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Aziz results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 7,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,104 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 56% (3,863 of 8,763 authors). This John Aziz is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
John Aziz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
56%John Aziz (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,104
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.2%12.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos