Keyword summary
97% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hypocrisy results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 5,391 hits . Analysis detected 32,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,282 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 70% (18,221 of 59,653 keywords). This Hypocrisy is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Hypocrisy
Keyword details
Total words: 19,282
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 28.0% 28.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst