Keyword summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,049 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House-Ethics-Committee results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Burden of Proof , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 633 hits . Analysis detected 2,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (29,894 of 59,653 keywords). This House-Ethics-Committee is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. House-Ethics-Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst