Keyword summary
87% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green River results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,741 hits . Analysis detected 13,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,890 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 39% (31,930 of 51,681 keywords). This Green River is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Green River
Keyword details
Total words: 15,890
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score11 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst