Publication summary
85% 335 analyzed articles/videos 196,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KUER results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 64,291 hits . Analysis detected 699,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 877,160 analyzed words across 332 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 48% (306 of 580 publications). This KUER is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 877,160
Article count: 332
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score332 analyzed articles877.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst