Keyword summary
71% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gates Foundation results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,021 hits . Analysis detected 6,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,568 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (37,361 of 59,653 keywords). This Gates Foundation is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Gates Foundation
Keyword details
Total words: 7,568
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst