Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gas-Prices results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 840 hits . Analysis detected 6,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,678 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (10,643 of 60,027 keywords). This Gas-Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Gas-Prices
Keyword details
Total words: 3,678
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.3% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst