Keyword summary
71%3 analyzed articles/videos796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Employees results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 6,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,168 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (25,472 of 59,653 keywords). This Federal Employees is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Federal Employees
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
58%Federal Employees (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,168
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos