Keyword summary
86% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doordash results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 941 hits . Analysis detected 8,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,317 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (26,083 of 59,653 keywords). This Doordash is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Doordash
Keyword details
Total words: 7,317
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst