‘No Cheese’ Costs Extra? Viral DoorDash Video Sparks Heated Debate 55%

By Sohini59%

8/7/2026, 5:31:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.7% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 974 faulty-reasoning hits from 537 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (13,691 of 30,213 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the article peer group.

According to a video posted on X by @WallStreetApes, DoorDash is “charging to remove” food items. 
A viral DoorDash clip highlighting hidden customization fees has sparked frustration among food delivery users. 
In a video viewed more than 40,000 times, the platform’s order screen shows patrons being charged an additional $0.09 for basic ingredient removals, such as opting for “No Cheese” or “No Egg.” 
The video’s overlay text says, “DoorDash charging to remove [customizations] now.” 
Also, the narrator asks why customers would have to pay to have ingredients removed, especially for allergies. 
“Bro, they’re (…) charging to remove [customizations] on the… burrito,” the narrator says. 
“Imagine you’re allergic to cheese… Charging to remove items from food is pretty wild.” 
The video also shows a separate receipt that shows a restaurant charging 75 cents to cut a burrito in half as the narrator adds: “American businesses have lost their minds.” 
However, DoorDash does not set the charges one sees in the video. 
According to DoorDash’s merchant menu management system, restaurants are in charge of their own menus, including the cost of add-ons and changes. 
So, as part of their inventory and menu settings, restaurant partners can set up customization options, such as charging for additions/deletions. 
As a result, the cost of removing ingredients on DoorDash varies. 
Restaurants are now charging to remove items in the DoorDash App 
If you want items that come in this burrito removed, you must pay extra 
Places are even charging to “cut in half” 
This literally saves them money but they are charging you for it…. 
There’s no limit to what’s… pic.twitter.com/24kQU73mef 
- Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) August 6, 2026 
While many other restaurants are continuing to offer ingredient removals at no extra cost, others have complained about paying minor fees, like 9-cent charges. 
Commenters on X, however, talked about the pricing strategy and the growing use of food delivery apps. 
One user said, “Never used it, never will. 
Get (…) out of the house and pick it up.” 
Another added, “Cook your own food. 
Problem solved!” 
Other commenters suggested alternative services or criticized delivery culture. 
“You can do this for free on Uber Eats,” one claimed, while another wrote, “If you order on DoorDash, you get what you get. 
Never done it, never will.” 
Some were frustrated with DoorDash’s business practices: “Those drivers are definitely not gonna get a bigger tip.” 
Another person who chimed in on this conversation claimed to have completed DoorDash training in 2018 and said that drivers were also told to put extra pressure on restaurants over food preparation delays. 
The Daily Dot hasn’t been able to verify the claim independently. 
Do they have robots making the burritos?!! 
Or, are burritos pre made already??! 
- CORRitOUT! 
(@CORRitOUT) August 6, 2026 
Several users also said that the video only makes them more enraged about à la carte charges being imposed by restaurants. 
Many thus were against these increasingly common à la carte charges. 
Sign up to receive the Daily Dot’s Internet Insider newsletter for urgent news from the frontline of online. 
The post ‘No Cheese’ Costs Extra? 
Viral DoorDash Video Sparks Heated Debate appeared first on The Daily Dot . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sohini: 3.1%dailydot.com: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Sohini: 1.1%dailydot.com: 0.8%Anchoring Bias10.4%This article: 15.3%Sohini: 3.1%dailydot.com: 3.5%Availability Heuristic15.3%This article: 3.9%Sohini: 0.7%dailydot.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.9%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.7%dailydot.com: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Sohini: 1.0%dailydot.com: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 4.8%Sohini: 4.2%dailydot.com: 4.1%Framing Effect4.8%This article: 2.6%Sohini: 0.5%dailydot.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 1.1%Sohini: 1.2%dailydot.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.4%Sohini: 0.9%dailydot.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.4%This article: 7.3%Sohini: 1.1%dailydot.com: 1.1%Pessimism Bias7.3%This article: 31.7%Sohini: 6.3%dailydot.com: 7.5%Negativity Bias31.7%This article: 2.2%Sohini: 1.0%dailydot.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.4%dailydot.com: 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.2%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 1.4%dailydot.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.6%dailydot.com: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 2.5%dailydot.com: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Sohini: 1.9%dailydot.com: 1.7%Ad Hominem5.6%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.1%Sohini: 2.3%dailydot.com: 1.6%Appeal to Authority4.1%This article: 2.6%Sohini: 1.7%dailydot.com: 1.8%False Dilemma2.6%This article: 2.2%Sohini: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.2%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.3%Sohini: 6.4%dailydot.com: 7.6%Hasty Generalization20.3%This article: 2.8%Sohini: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.2%Red Herring2.8%This article: 1.7%Sohini: 1.6%dailydot.com: 2.0%Bandwagon1.7%This article: 7.6%Sohini: 4.8%dailydot.com: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.2%Sohini: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.2%This article: 1.1%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque1.1%This article: 6.1%Sohini: 1.3%dailydot.com: 1.5%Burden of Proof6.1%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.6%Sohini: 6.8%dailydot.com: 6.5%Anecdotal13.6%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.4%Sohini: 1.6%dailydot.com: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.4%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.4%dailydot.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 4.8%Sohini: 0.2%dailydot.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity4.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.0%dailydot.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.1%dailydot.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.0%Sohini: 3.3%dailydot.com: 4.2%Unattributed Quote2.0%This article: 5.0%Sohini: 3.7%dailydot.com: 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 2.8%Sohini: 3.0%dailydot.com: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice2.8%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.8%dailydot.com: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.3%dailydot.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sohini: 0.6%dailydot.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Sohini: 1.5%dailydot.com: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

537 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers6.7%attributed speech501writer words
Selected voice

DoorDash

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words61% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%DoorDash: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%DoorDash: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%DoorDash: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%DoorDash: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.