Topic summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Delivery Apps results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 1,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (13,069 of 24,439 topics). This Food Delivery Apps is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Food Delivery Apps
Topic details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos