Keyword summary
88% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Director Of National Intelligence results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 3,520 hits . Analysis detected 26,269 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,888 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (24,383 of 59,522 keywords). This Director Of National Intelligence is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Director Of National Intelligence
Keyword details
Total words: 20,888
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst