Keyword summary
76% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diabetes results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 3,454 hits . Analysis detected 34,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,970 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (51,001 of 58,458 keywords). This Diabetes is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Diabetes
Keyword details
Total words: 51,970
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score14 analyzed articles52K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst