Author summary
52% 9 analyzed articles/videos 9,297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Morales-Brown results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 3,426 hits . Analysis detected 23,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,601 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,989 of 9,471 authors). This Peter Morales-Brown is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Peter Morales-Brown
Author details
Total words: 41,601
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles41.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst