Keyword summary
79% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Department results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 2,431 hits . Analysis detected 17,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,596 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (44,189 of 59,653 keywords). This Defense Department is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Defense Department
Keyword details
Total words: 22,596
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst