Keyword summary
74% 22 analyzed articles/videos 20,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darializa Avila Chevalier results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 10,661 hits . Analysis detected 107,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 113,123 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (40,232 of 56,030 keywords). This Darializa Avila Chevalier is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Darializa Avila Chevalier
Keyword details
Total words: 113,123
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score22 analyzed articles113.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst