Keyword summary
76% 102 analyzed articles/videos 102,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybersecurity results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 29,602 hits . Analysis detected 260,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 420,453 analyzed words across 102 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (48,615 of 51,827 keywords). This Cybersecurity is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Cybersecurity
Keyword details
Total words: 420,453
Article count: 102
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score102 analyzed articles420.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst