Author summary
66% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Osborne results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 2,736 hits . Analysis detected 16,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,032 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,314 of 9,286 authors). This Charlie Osborne is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group. Charlie Osborne
Author details
Total words: 25,032
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles25K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst