Keyword summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowd results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 2,224 hits . Analysis detected 13,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,350 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (31,903 of 59,653 keywords). This Crowd is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Crowd
Keyword details
Total words: 15,350
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst