Keyword summary
94% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Championship results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,995 hits . Analysis detected 19,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,766 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (39,009 of 58,524 keywords). This Championship is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Championship
Keyword details
Total words: 21,766
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles21.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst