Keyword summary
74% 18 analyzed articles/videos 10,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Models results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 4,485 hits . Analysis detected 45,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,406 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (37,902 of 53,020 keywords). This Ai Models is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Ai Models
Keyword details
Total words: 49,406
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score18 analyzed articles49.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst