Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion-Pills results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 92% (4,820 of 55,219 keywords). This Abortion-Pills is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Abortion-Pills
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
92%Abortion-Pills (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.3% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate