Author summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,730 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Rinkunas results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Slippery Slope, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,042 hits. Analysis detected 9,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,698 of 8,942 authors). This Susan Rinkunas is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Susan Rinkunas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
48%Susan Rinkunas (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,576
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos