Author summary
92% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Linly results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 6,367 hits . Analysis detected 35,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,660 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,558 of 9,487 authors). This Zack Linly is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Zack Linly
Author details
Total words: 18,660
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.1% 34.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 28.8% 28.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.1% 29.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 29.1%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 12.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst