Publication summary
93% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 92 Q results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 2,552 hits . Analysis detected 15,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,724 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (68 of 584 publications). This 92 Q is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 9,724
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 26.2% 26.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 26.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Publication 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 16.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Horn Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst