Publication summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 93.9 WKYS results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 1,288 hits . Analysis detected 5,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 99% (12 of 584 publications). This 93.9 WKYS is worse (more manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,184
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.1% percentile 6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 40.5% 40.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 25.5% 25.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 31.7% 31.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Publication 7.9% 7.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 40.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Publication 31.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 25.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.6% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst