Author summary
70% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Martens results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,113 hits . Analysis detected 9,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,325 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,428 of 8,706 authors). This Todd Martens is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Todd Martens
Author details
Total words: 10,325
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst