Author summary
45% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jaclyn Cosgrove results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 903 hits . Analysis detected 8,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,460 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,098 of 8,737 authors). This Jaclyn Cosgrove is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Jaclyn Cosgrove
Author details
Total words: 13,460
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst