Author summary
7% 3 analyzed articles/videos 529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Schulz results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 88 hits . Analysis detected 300 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,891 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (6,160 of 9,471 authors). This Sara Schulz is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Sara Schulz
Author details
Total words: 1,891
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst