Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noelle Friel results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,155 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (2,263 of 9,471 authors). This Noelle Friel is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Noelle Friel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠77%Noelle Friel (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,155
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos